Clawgate Clawgate
Blog

Run AI under control — and know what it costs

Practical guides and real cost breakdowns for running Claude Code and Codex: per-model pricing, open-weight models like GLM 5.2, budgets, and governance.

Cost control

Smart Model Routing: Pay Top Prices Only When You Need To

Most coding-agent work is routine and doesn't need your priciest model. Smart routing serves the cheapest capable model per request, so you pay top rates only when the work needs it. One switch, no tuning.

Read article →
Cost control

How to Control Claude Code Costs Across Your Team

Three levers do the work: see who spends what, set hard-stop budgets, and control which model runs. Plus how token compression cut our own bill 70%.

Read article →
How-to guide

How to Set a Budget for Claude Code (Per User and Project)

Set daily or weekly caps in dollars, tokens, or sessions, per user and per project. Hard stops block spend before it goes over, and alerts warn you first.

Read article →
How-to guide

How to Track Claude Code Usage by Developer and Project

See live cost per developer and per project by tagging every request to a user and a project. Stop guessing at one big bill, and charge costs back to the right team.

Read article →
Cost control

How to Stop Runaway AI Agent Costs and Surprise Bills

A forgotten agent loop or a leaked key can drain a budget quietly. Hard caps that block at the limit, plus spend-spike alerts and abuse detection, catch it early.

Read article →
Comparison

Clawgate vs LiteLLM: Which Fits Your Team

LiteLLM is a free, open-source gateway you run yourself. Clawgate is a managed tool built for governing Claude Code and Codex. An honest look at when each one wins.

Read article →
Guide

Cheapest Models for Claude Code and Codex

The same coding task cost 26¢ on one model and over $3 on another, about a 12× spread. How to match the model to the job and route work to the cheapest capable one.

Read article →
Feature

Prompt Compression for Claude Code and Codex

AI coding agents resend bulky context every turn, and you pay for it each time. Compression cuts up to 92% of those tokens while accuracy holds. Here's how it works.

Read article →
Feature

Control Claude Code Costs on AWS Bedrock

Route Claude Code through a gateway that holds the Bedrock access, so developers get AI without direct AWS keys, and every request has a per-user budget.

Read article →
Feature

AI Spend Control and Governance for Engineering Teams

Give your team AI while keeping spend under control: budgets, per-project tracking, model control, and abuse alerts in one dashboard, at fair pass-through pricing.

Read article →
Comparison

The Best Claude Code Cost Management Tools in 2026

Clawgate, LiteLLM, Portkey, Helicone, and the built-in Anthropic/OpenAI limits — compared honestly on hard-stop budgets, per-developer cost tracking, setup effort, and pricing, including where each competitor is the better pick.

Read article →
Cost control

Your Team Got 3x Faster with AI Coding Tools. Do You Know What It's Actually Costing You?

Uber burned its 2026 AI budget in four months. Meta's staff used 73.7 trillion tokens in 30 days. The speed is real — so is the cost. What goes wrong, and how a control layer keeps both.

Read article →
Cost control

How I Cut 70% of My Team's AI Costs

One prompt, six top models, one fair comparison. The cheapest run cost 26¢, the priciest over $3 — a 12× spread for the same task. Here's how to see real per-model cost and stop overpaying.

Read article →
How-to guide

How to Run GLM 5.2 in Claude Code and Codex with Clawgate AI

A step-by-step guide to running GLM 5.2 — an open-weight model near Opus benchmarks at a fraction of the cost — inside Claude Code and Codex, with one key, dashboard model control, and automatic usage tracking.

Read article →

Put your AI spend under control.

Give your team the AI they need. Give yourself the visibility and control you need.